Iraq’s vice-president has vetoed part of the country’s new election
law, placing the planned elections for January in jeopardy because he
objected to the lack of parliamentary representation of refugees. This
bold step should remind the international community that, as most
attention and resources have shifted east to Pakistan and Afghanistan,
Iraq’s refugees have not disappeared. As the delay of this critical
law shows, it is clear that Iraq’s domestic politics are intricately
tied to the refugee question.
Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees remain scattered throughout
Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt. Tens of thousands more continue to
seek asylum in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. For the third
consecutive year, Iraq was the leading country of origin for asylum
seekers in industrialized countries, almost twice as high as the next
largest group. In a recent survey, 83% of Iraqi refugees interviewed
in Jordan and Syria said that they had no plans to return to Iraq due
to ongoing insecurity, lack of jobs, and no ability to access or
petition for their original homes and property.
In the absence of large-scale returns, ever the more uncertain with the
planned U.S. withdrawal in 2010, the Iraqi refugee problem will likely
become a protracted one. To its credit the U.S. alone has already
resettled 35,000 Iraqis and given large amounts in humanitarian aid over
the last two years. However, there is no plan in place to engage in
large-scale resettlement—thus leaving the majority of Iraqi refugees
behind. Moreover, most host governments in the region are not actively
considering any form of permanent residence for Iraqis.
The lack of immediate solutions for Iraqi refugees makes it imperative
that the international humanitarian community and the U.S. in
particular not forget these people—not least because their future is so
clearly tied to the future stability of Iraq and the region.