![]() |
04/05/2005
Contact: Michelle Brown and Yodit Fitigu,
ri@refugeesinternational.org or 202-828-0110
After an extremely slow start, United Nations agencies and aid
organizations have improved their response to the roughly 210,000
refugees from Darfur living in Chad. Refugees have been relocated
from the border and are now living in camps where their basic needs are
being met, although water and firewood will always be issues. The
World Food Program seems to have sorted out the food pipeline, and
refugees will receive regular distributions, at least through June.
Many refugee children are in school, and more schools are under
construction. Refugees say that with the exception of threats
from surrounding host communities, they generally feel safe in the
camps.
Despite these positive accomplishments, key challenges remain,
particularly in the northern and central camps. Refugees
International did not visit refugee camps in the south, where the
situation is somewhat better. Tensions with host communities are
on the increase. There is a lack of comprehensive UN response in
eastern Chad, particularly from the Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO), UN Development Program (UNDP) and UN Population Fund
(UNFPA). Additional sites for refugee camps need to be
identified. There is a lack of aid agencies working with
refugees, particularly those with expertise in child protection,
gender-based violence and mental health. National staffs of
humanitarian agencies have limited capacity. In addition,
development agencies to assist the local population are few and far
between.
There is a steady but small trickle of new refugees arriving from
Chadian border towns where they were living with host families or from
the places in Sudan where they have been hiding for the past year after
their villages of origin were attacked. Another large-scale
influx of refugees seems unlikely.
Although some camps are still too close to the Sudanese border, most
refugees live in a fairly stable situation. The refugees are
adamant that it is unsafe for them to return to Darfur; they trust
neither the Government of Sudan nor the African Union to protect
them. Aid agencies estimate that refugees from Darfur will be in
Chad for at least two years, and agencies are currently making the
transition from emergency response to implementing longer term care and
maintenance programs and will need funding to carry out these programs.
One of the largest challenges facing the aid community in eastern Chad
is how to best assist refugees in a situation where the host population
is just as poor and vulnerable. Competition for water, grazing
land for animals, and firewood has led to increased tensions between
the local communities and refugees. The situation was described to RI
as “a time bomb waiting to happen.” According to an aid worker in
eastern Chad, “The need to assist local communities is something we are
all aware of. If the locals do not see some benefit to having the
refugees here, then refugees will face more problems in the
future. Right now, the local communities see the food trucks come
in and give refugees free food when they themselves do not have food.”
Agencies admit that they have been slow to develop programs for local
communities.
Eastern Chad is the poorest region in one of the least developed
counties in the world. People living in eastern Chad face chronic
food insecurity, lack of water, and an almost total lack of government
presence. The large influx of Sudanese refugees in eastern Chad
has greatly aggravated their already bleak conditions. Despite their
poverty, many Chadians opened their homes to refugees from Darfur and
assisted them when they first crossed the border. This depleted
food stocks of host families. Their situation has worsened in the
past year due to lack of rainfall and poor harvests, and locals have no
seeds for the upcoming planting season. It is critical that
seeds, as well as seed protection rations, be distributed as soon as
possible to local communities.
Aid agencies are attempting to address the needs of local
communities. Some Chadians are registered as refugees, but
agencies are wisely not making an issue of this. Chadians are
able to use camp services, and health clinics in the camps are the only
access many of them have to health care. The UN High Commissioner
for Refugees will dedicate five percent of its program budget to
assisting local communities, and WFP will begin food for work and
school feeding programs. The UN Children’s Fund will start water
programs. While these interventions are important, there is a
clear need for donors to fund more long term, sustainable livelihood
programs, which benefit both nomadic and sedentary populations.
Conflicts caused by firewood collection are the most obvious example of
worsening tensions between local communities and refugees. Male
and female refugees explained to RI that one of their biggest concerns
is that locals will attack women when they are out collecting
firewood. There have been few documented cases of rape, but local
men will often harass refugee women and force them to turn over the
firewood they have collected. UNHCR and aid agencies are in the
process of arranging for firewood to be included as part of the monthly
ration in some camps. In some cases they have organized groups of
women to collect firewood to improve security. Fuel efficient
stoves have been introduced in some camps. In the two Guereda
camps, there are dispute resolution committees composed of refugee and
local leaders. Refugees report that relations with the local
community have improved since the committees were formed.
Another protection concern is the close proximity of two camps, Oure
Cassoni and Am Nabak, to the border, although the refugees very clearly
want to stay close to home. Oure Cassoni is particularly
problematic. There are concerns that the Sudanese Liberation
Army, an anti-government rebel group, is exerting influence over the
camp, although the camp is not obviously militarized. Unlike most
other refugee camps in Chad, water is not an issue for Oure
Cassoni. But water must be trucked into Am Nabak. Finding
suitable sites, far enough away from the border, with access to water
has proven to be complicated, but camp relocation should be a
priority. In addition, gaining permission from local authorities
has been problematic. For example, a site with water around
Biltin was identified, but local authorities refused to grant UNHCR
permission to relocate the refugees in Oure Cassoni.
Besides obvious threats, the overall protection environment remains
largely unknown. Most of the agencies in the camps are working
with the refugee population for the first time. Both the Massalit
and Zagawa cultures are difficult to penetrate. Aid agencies have
found it difficult to build trust and understand the cultural dynamics
at play. It is therefore complicated to assess the more hidden
problems in the camp—domestic violence, early and forced marriage,
rape—in order to develop appropriate responses. In addition,
there seems to be a lack of information sharing between agencies
working in Darfur and those implementing similar programs in Chad in
order to establish a common approach.
At present, community services programs are fairly limited, although
there are plans to expand. It is too soon to assess the adequacy
or effectiveness of the few programs underway. Community service
workers identify vulnerable groups, but in most camps, there are
currently no programs to which to refer them. Child protection
has been identified as a serious gap, and the response to child
protection has been incredibly slow. Currently, Christian
Children’s Fund is the only agency running programs specifically for
children.
Mental health has also been identified as a serious gap, particularly
given the violence that many refugees experienced in Darfur.
According to refugees that RI interviewed, some members of their
families and communities either show signs of withdrawal or
aggression. Refugees reported that in extreme cases people
requiring restraint are tied to trees. Doctors Without Borders
has a psychologist on staff, but in most camps psycho-social programs
have not yet started. In addition, humanitarian workers that RI
interviewed identified programs for women as a priority need,
particularly income generation, gender- based violence sensitization
and response and non-formal education programs. In some camps, income
generation and literacy programs have started but these programs are
not yet widespread. These programs also serve as an important mechanism
to decrease women’s vulnerability and can assist survivors of violence
in their recovery.
Refugees International, therefore,
recommends that:
Chad: Strengthen the Response to Gender-based Violence
Chad: Inadequate Response to Child Protection for Sudanese Refugees
Sudan: A Climate of Impunity in Darfur
Sudan: Internally Displaced Remain Terrorized and Afraid to Go Home
Refugee Voices: Sudanese Hairdresser in Tine, Chad
Refugee Voices: We meet again in Masteri Village
Visual Mission: Darfur Refugees Flee to Chad
Chad: Mission to Assess Conditions for Refugees from Darfur
Your support helps us save lives throughout the world.
Ways You Can Help
|
|